DataCamp vs Razorpay
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
DataCamp and Razorpay both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
Razorpay (rank #30) holds a meaningful lead over DataCamp (rank #372) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (63 vs 42). The gap of 21 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.
On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Razorpay is clearly ahead of DataCamp. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), DataCamp is ahead of Razorpay. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Razorpay is ahead of DataCamp. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Razorpay is ahead of DataCamp. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Razorpay is clearly ahead of DataCamp.
DataCamp carries 5,838 GitHub stars across 180 public repos, with 3 repositories active in the last 90 days and 0 external contributors on record. Razorpay shows 3,811 stars across 177 public repos, 38 active in the last 90 days and 32 external contributors.
DataCamp is the stronger read for anyone weighting education. Razorpay looks better where momentum is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | DataCamp | Razorpay |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #372 | #30 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 42 | 63 |
| Code | 44 | 68 |
| Education | 67 | 53 |
| Community | 26 | 44 |
| Reach | 41 | 58 |
| Momentum | 6 | 71 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 5,838 | 3,811 |
| Forks | 3,688 | 1,932 |
| Public repos | 180 | 177 |
| Active repos (90d) | 3 | 38 |
| External contributors | 0 | 32 |
| Avg polish | 48 | 69 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 30 | 49 |