World-class products that work together to streamline your business. We're hiring!
DataCamp vs Teamwork.com
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
DataCamp and Teamwork.com (World-class products that work together to streamline your business. We're hiring!) both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
Teamwork.com (rank #237) holds a narrow lead over DataCamp (rank #372) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (48 vs 42). The gap of 6 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.
On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Teamwork.com is ahead of DataCamp. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), DataCamp is slightly ahead of Teamwork.com. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Teamwork.com is ahead of DataCamp. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Teamwork.com is slightly ahead of DataCamp. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Teamwork.com is clearly ahead of DataCamp.
DataCamp carries 5,838 GitHub stars across 180 public repos, with 3 repositories active in the last 90 days and 0 external contributors on record. Teamwork.com shows 2,108 stars across 123 public repos, 14 active in the last 90 days and 13 external contributors.
DataCamp is the stronger read for anyone weighting education. Teamwork.com looks better where momentum is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | DataCamp | Teamwork.com |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #372 | #237 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 42 | 48 |
| Code | 44 | 58 |
| Education | 67 | 59 |
| Community | 26 | 37 |
| Reach | 41 | 47 |
| Momentum | 6 | 27 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 5,838 | 2,108 |
| Forks | 3,688 | 384 |
| Public repos | 180 | 123 |
| Active repos (90d) | 3 | 14 |
| External contributors | 0 | 13 |
| Avg polish | 48 | 62 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 30 | 38 |