Developer ecosystem comparison
vs

DataCamp vs Perk

Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.

DataCamp and Perk (We're fixing business travel.) both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

DataCamp and Perk sit at essentially the same overall ecosystem score (42), which is unusual and worth reading through the pillars below.

On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), DataCamp is ahead of Perk. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Perk is ahead of DataCamp. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), DataCamp is ahead of Perk. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Perk is clearly ahead of DataCamp.

DataCamp carries 5,838 GitHub stars across 180 public repos, with 3 repositories active in the last 90 days and 0 external contributors on record. Perk shows 34 stars across 25 public repos, 5 active in the last 90 days and 6 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but DataCamp's footprint is roughly 171.7x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.

DataCamp is the stronger read for anyone weighting education. Perk looks better where momentum is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.

Side-by-side metrics

MetricDataCampPerk
Ranking
Overall rank#372#372
Pillars
Overall4242
Code4444
Education6754
Community2638
Reach4130
Momentum648
Builder experience00
Signals
Stars5,83834
Forks3,68811
Public repos18025
Active repos (90d)35
External contributors06
Avg polish4833
Avg AI-readiness3038

Fork ecosystems

Loading fork ecosystem…
Loading fork ecosystem…
View DataCamp developer profileView Perk developer profile