Datto, Inc. vs RingCentral, Inc.
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
Datto, Inc. and RingCentral, Inc. both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
RingCentral, Inc. (rank #372) holds a modest lead over Datto, Inc. (rank #662) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (42 vs 32). The gap of 10 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.
On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), RingCentral, Inc. is clearly ahead of Datto, Inc.. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Datto, Inc. is clearly ahead of RingCentral, Inc. . On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), RingCentral, Inc. is clearly ahead of Datto, Inc.. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), RingCentral, Inc. is ahead of Datto, Inc.. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), RingCentral, Inc. is clearly ahead of Datto, Inc..
Datto, Inc. carries 1,115 GitHub stars across 63 public repos, with 1 repositories active in the last 90 days and 2 external contributors on record. RingCentral, Inc. shows 1,659 stars across 184 public repos, 31 active in the last 90 days and 17 external contributors.
Datto, Inc. is the stronger read for anyone weighting education. RingCentral, Inc. looks better where momentum is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | Datto, Inc. | RingCentral, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #662 | #372 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 32 | 42 |
| Code | 38 | 59 |
| Education | 77 | 52 |
| Community | 19 | 42 |
| Reach | 6 | 23 |
| Momentum | 14 | 39 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 1,115 | 1,659 |
| Forks | 315 | 23,722 |
| Public repos | 63 | 184 |
| Active repos (90d) | 1 | 31 |
| External contributors | 2 | 17 |
| Avg polish | 45 | 57 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 19 | 48 |