Deezer vs Doist
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
Deezer and Doist (Empowering people with simple yet powerful tools ✨) both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
Doist (rank #122) holds a modest lead over Deezer (rank #536) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (54 vs 36). The gap of 18 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.
On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Doist is ahead of Deezer. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Doist is slightly ahead of Deezer. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Deezer is clearly ahead of Doist. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Doist is clearly ahead of Deezer. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Doist is clearly ahead of Deezer.
Deezer carries 29,854 GitHub stars across 99 public repos, with 5 repositories active in the last 90 days and 2 external contributors on record. Doist shows 5,576 stars across 170 public repos, 45 active in the last 90 days and 21 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but Deezer's footprint is roughly 5.4x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.
Deezer is the stronger read for anyone weighting community. Doist looks better where momentum is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | Deezer | Doist |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #536 | #122 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 36 | 54 |
| Code | 41 | 59 |
| Education | 79 | 85 |
| Community | 61 | 36 |
| Reach | 11 | 40 |
| Momentum | 9 | 46 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 29,854 | 5,576 |
| Forks | 3,369 | 563 |
| Public repos | 99 | 170 |
| Active repos (90d) | 5 | 45 |
| External contributors | 2 | 21 |
| Avg polish | 47 | 58 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 28 | 47 |