Automations for business and home. 1,000+ of your favorite apps, services and devices. Save time and get more done.
Deezer vs IFTTT
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
Deezer and IFTTT (Automations for business and home. 1,000+ of your favorite apps, services and devices. Save time and get more done.) both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
IFTTT (rank #430) holds a narrow lead over Deezer (rank #536) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (40 vs 36). The gap of 4 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.
On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), IFTTT is slightly ahead of Deezer. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Deezer is slightly ahead of IFTTT. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Deezer is clearly ahead of IFTTT. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), IFTTT is clearly ahead of Deezer. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Deezer is slightly ahead of IFTTT.
Deezer carries 29,854 GitHub stars across 99 public repos, with 5 repositories active in the last 90 days and 2 external contributors on record. IFTTT shows 15,307 stars across 75 public repos, 1 active in the last 90 days and 2 external contributors.
Deezer is the stronger read for anyone weighting community. IFTTT looks better where reach is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | Deezer | IFTTT |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #536 | #430 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 36 | 40 |
| Code | 41 | 46 |
| Education | 79 | 72 |
| Community | 61 | 31 |
| Reach | 11 | 56 |
| Momentum | 9 | 2 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 29,854 | 15,307 |
| Forks | 3,369 | 1,499 |
| Public repos | 99 | 75 |
| Active repos (90d) | 5 | 1 |
| External contributors | 2 | 2 |
| Avg polish | 47 | 49 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 28 | 42 |