Deezer vs Razorpay
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
Deezer and Razorpay both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
Razorpay (rank #30) holds a meaningful lead over Deezer (rank #536) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (63 vs 36). The gap of 27 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.
On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Razorpay is clearly ahead of Deezer. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Deezer is clearly ahead of Razorpay. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Deezer is ahead of Razorpay. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Razorpay is clearly ahead of Deezer. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Razorpay is clearly ahead of Deezer.
Deezer carries 29,854 GitHub stars across 99 public repos, with 5 repositories active in the last 90 days and 2 external contributors on record. Razorpay shows 3,811 stars across 177 public repos, 38 active in the last 90 days and 32 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but Deezer's footprint is roughly 7.8x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.
Deezer is the stronger read for anyone weighting education. Razorpay looks better where momentum is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | Deezer | Razorpay |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #536 | #30 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 36 | 63 |
| Code | 41 | 68 |
| Education | 79 | 53 |
| Community | 61 | 44 |
| Reach | 11 | 58 |
| Momentum | 9 | 71 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 29,854 | 3,811 |
| Forks | 3,369 | 1,932 |
| Public repos | 99 | 177 |
| Active repos (90d) | 5 | 38 |
| External contributors | 2 | 32 |
| Avg polish | 47 | 69 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 28 | 49 |