Deezer vs Revolut
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
Deezer and Revolut (Revolut Open Source) both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
Deezer (rank #536) holds a narrow lead over Revolut (rank #693) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (36 vs 31). The gap of 5 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.
On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Deezer is slightly ahead of Revolut. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Deezer is clearly ahead of Revolut. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Deezer is clearly ahead of Revolut. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Revolut is clearly ahead of Deezer. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Revolut is ahead of Deezer.
Deezer carries 29,854 GitHub stars across 99 public repos, with 5 repositories active in the last 90 days and 2 external contributors on record. Revolut shows 260 stars across 35 public repos, 5 active in the last 90 days and 1 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but Deezer's footprint is roughly 114.8x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.
Deezer is the stronger read for anyone weighting community. Revolut looks better where reach is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | Deezer | Revolut |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #536 | #693 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 36 | 31 |
| Code | 41 | 40 |
| Education | 79 | 52 |
| Community | 61 | 26 |
| Reach | 11 | 40 |
| Momentum | 9 | 20 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 29,854 | 260 |
| Forks | 3,369 | 142 |
| Public repos | 99 | 35 |
| Active repos (90d) | 5 | 5 |
| External contributors | 2 | 1 |
| Avg polish | 47 | 38 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 28 | 29 |