Deezer vs Skyscanner

Deezer and Skyscanner both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

Skyscanner (rank #209) holds a modest lead over Deezer (rank #536) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (49 vs 36). The gap of 13 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.

On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Skyscanner is clearly ahead of Deezer. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Deezer is slightly ahead of Skyscanner. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Deezer is clearly ahead of Skyscanner. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Skyscanner is clearly ahead of Deezer. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Skyscanner is clearly ahead of Deezer.

Deezer carries 29,854 GitHub stars across 99 public repos, with 5 repositories active in the last 90 days and 2 external contributors on record. Skyscanner shows 8,167 stars across 86 public repos, 18 active in the last 90 days and 39 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but Deezer's footprint is roughly 3.7x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.

Deezer is the stronger read for anyone weighting community. Skyscanner looks better where momentum is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.