The most powerful form and workflow solution available for WordPress.
Dialpad vs Gravity Forms
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
Dialpad and Gravity Forms (The most powerful form and workflow solution available for WordPress.) both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
Dialpad (rank #317) holds a modest lead over Gravity Forms (rank #662) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (44 vs 32). The gap of 12 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.
On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Dialpad is clearly ahead of Gravity Forms. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Gravity Forms is slightly ahead of Dialpad. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Dialpad is slightly ahead of Gravity Forms. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Dialpad is clearly ahead of Gravity Forms. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Gravity Forms is clearly ahead of Dialpad.
Dialpad carries 111 GitHub stars across 25 public repos, with 5 repositories active in the last 90 days and 19 external contributors on record. Gravity Forms shows 112 stars across 8 public repos, 2 active in the last 90 days and 1 external contributors.
Dialpad is the stronger read for anyone weighting code quality. Gravity Forms looks better where momentum is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | Dialpad | Gravity Forms |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #317 | #662 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 44 | 32 |
| Code | 53 | 21 |
| Education | 72 | 78 |
| Community | 20 | 12 |
| Reach | 57 | 29 |
| Momentum | 15 | 40 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 111 | 112 |
| Forks | 45 | 66 |
| Public repos | 25 | 8 |
| Active repos (90d) | 5 | 2 |
| External contributors | 19 | 1 |
| Avg polish | 54 | 24 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 38 | 8 |