Dialpad vs Hotjar
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
Dialpad and Hotjar (Product Experience Insights Tools) both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
Dialpad and Hotjar sit at essentially the same overall ecosystem score (44), which is unusual and worth reading through the pillars below.
On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Hotjar is slightly ahead of Dialpad. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Hotjar is ahead of Dialpad. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Hotjar is slightly ahead of Dialpad. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Hotjar is slightly ahead of Dialpad. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Hotjar is ahead of Dialpad.
Dialpad carries 111 GitHub stars across 25 public repos, with 5 repositories active in the last 90 days and 19 external contributors on record. Hotjar shows 52 stars across 2 public repos, 1 active in the last 90 days and 2 external contributors.
Dialpad is worth a look for teams already invested in its stack. Hotjar looks better where education is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | Dialpad | Hotjar |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #317 | #317 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 44 | 44 |
| Code | 53 | 56 |
| Education | 72 | 88 |
| Community | 20 | 22 |
| Reach | 57 | 62 |
| Momentum | 15 | 24 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 111 | 52 |
| Forks | 45 | 10 |
| Public repos | 25 | 2 |
| Active repos (90d) | 5 | 1 |
| External contributors | 19 | 2 |
| Avg polish | 54 | 45 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 38 | 60 |