Dialpad vs Stripe Samples
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
Dialpad and Stripe Samples (Sample integrations built by Stripe.) both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
Stripe Samples (rank #141) holds a modest lead over Dialpad (rank #317) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (53 vs 44). The gap of 9 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.
On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Stripe Samples is ahead of Dialpad. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Stripe Samples is ahead of Dialpad. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Stripe Samples is clearly ahead of Dialpad. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Dialpad is clearly ahead of Stripe Samples. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Stripe Samples is clearly ahead of Dialpad.
Dialpad carries 111 GitHub stars across 25 public repos, with 5 repositories active in the last 90 days and 19 external contributors on record. Stripe Samples shows 4,227 stars across 30 public repos, 23 active in the last 90 days and 8 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but Stripe Samples's footprint is roughly 38.1x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.
Dialpad is the stronger read for anyone weighting reach. Stripe Samples looks better where momentum is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | Dialpad | Stripe Samples |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #317 | #141 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 44 | 53 |
| Code | 53 | 66 |
| Education | 72 | 85 |
| Community | 20 | 47 |
| Reach | 57 | 8 |
| Momentum | 15 | 52 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 111 | 4,227 |
| Forks | 45 | 2,301 |
| Public repos | 25 | 30 |
| Active repos (90d) | 5 | 23 |
| External contributors | 19 | 8 |
| Avg polish | 54 | 76 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 38 | 34 |