Discord vs Wrike

Discord (A new way to chat with your communities and friends. Discord is the easiest way to communicate over voice, video, and text.) and Wrike (Welcome to the Wrike TechClub open source community. Let's make tech world better together! NB: members must have two-factor auth.) both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

Discord (rank #103) holds a meaningful lead over Wrike (rank #602) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (55 vs 34). The gap of 21 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.

On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Discord is slightly ahead of Wrike. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Discord is slightly ahead of Wrike. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Discord is clearly ahead of Wrike. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Discord is clearly ahead of Wrike. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Discord is clearly ahead of Wrike.

Discord carries 28,570 GitHub stars across 327 public repos, with 36 repositories active in the last 90 days and 41 external contributors on record. Wrike shows 276 stars across 33 public repos, 1 active in the last 90 days and 0 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but Discord's footprint is roughly 103.5x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.

Discord is the stronger read for anyone weighting momentum. Wrike makes more sense for teams already using its adjacent tools. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.