Discourse vs Doctolib

Discourse (The 100% open source discussion platform built for the next decade of the Internet.) and Doctolib (Our mission is to build together the healthcare we all dream of. Learn more about our engineering team on our career page.) both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

Discourse (rank #189) holds a modest lead over Doctolib (rank #625) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (50 vs 33). The gap of 17 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.

On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Discourse is ahead of Doctolib. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Doctolib is ahead of Discourse. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Discourse is ahead of Doctolib. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Discourse is ahead of Doctolib. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Discourse is clearly ahead of Doctolib.

Discourse carries 55,678 GitHub stars across 620 public repos, with 90 repositories active in the last 90 days and 44 external contributors on record. Doctolib shows 776 stars across 57 public repos, 10 active in the last 90 days and 5 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but Discourse's footprint is roughly 71.8x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.

Discourse is the stronger read for anyone weighting momentum. Doctolib looks better where education is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.