Discourse vs Wrike

Discourse (The 100% open source discussion platform built for the next decade of the Internet.) and Wrike (Welcome to the Wrike TechClub open source community. Let's make tech world better together! NB: members must have two-factor auth.) both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

Discourse (rank #189) holds a modest lead over Wrike (rank #602) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (50 vs 34). The gap of 16 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.

On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Discourse is ahead of Wrike. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Wrike is clearly ahead of Discourse. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Discourse is clearly ahead of Wrike. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Discourse is ahead of Wrike. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Discourse is clearly ahead of Wrike.

Discourse carries 55,678 GitHub stars across 620 public repos, with 90 repositories active in the last 90 days and 44 external contributors on record. Wrike shows 276 stars across 33 public repos, 1 active in the last 90 days and 0 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but Discourse's footprint is roughly 201.7x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.

Discourse is the stronger read for anyone weighting momentum. Wrike looks better where education is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.