Doctolib vs Elastic Path Software

Doctolib (Our mission is to build together the healthcare we all dream of. Learn more about our engineering team on our career page.) and Elastic Path Software both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

Doctolib (rank #625) holds a narrow lead over Elastic Path Software (rank #696) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (33 vs 31). The gap of 2 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.

On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Elastic Path Software is slightly ahead of Doctolib. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Doctolib is ahead of Elastic Path Software. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Doctolib is slightly ahead of Elastic Path Software. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Doctolib is slightly ahead of Elastic Path Software. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Doctolib is slightly ahead of Elastic Path Software.

Doctolib carries 776 GitHub stars across 57 public repos, with 9 repositories active in the last 90 days and 5 external contributors on record. Elastic Path Software shows 234 stars across 39 public repos, 8 active in the last 90 days and 2 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but Doctolib's footprint is roughly 3.3x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.

Doctolib is the stronger read for anyone weighting education. Elastic Path Software looks better where code quality is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.