Doctolib vs Fillout

Doctolib (Our mission is to build together the healthcare we all dream of. Learn more about our engineering team on our career page.) and Fillout both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

Fillout (rank #510) holds a narrow lead over Doctolib (rank #625) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (37 vs 33). The gap of 4 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.

On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Doctolib is ahead of Fillout. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Doctolib is ahead of Fillout. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Doctolib is slightly ahead of Fillout. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Fillout is clearly ahead of Doctolib. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Doctolib is slightly ahead of Fillout.

Doctolib carries 776 GitHub stars across 57 public repos, with 10 repositories active in the last 90 days and 5 external contributors on record. Fillout shows 2 stars across 9 public repos, 3 active in the last 90 days and 3 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but Doctolib's footprint is roughly 388.0x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.

Doctolib is the stronger read for anyone weighting education. Fillout looks better where reach is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.