Doctolib vs Front

Doctolib (Our mission is to build together the healthcare we all dream of. Learn more about our engineering team on our career page.) and Front both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

Doctolib and Front sit at essentially the same overall ecosystem score (33), which is unusual and worth reading through the pillars below.

On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Doctolib is ahead of Front. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Doctolib is ahead of Front. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Doctolib is ahead of Front. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Front is clearly ahead of Doctolib.

Doctolib carries 776 GitHub stars across 57 public repos, with 9 repositories active in the last 90 days and 5 external contributors on record. Front shows 103 stars across 122 public repos, 8 active in the last 90 days and 3 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but Doctolib's footprint is roughly 7.5x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.

Doctolib is the stronger read for anyone weighting code quality. Front looks better where momentum is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.