Doctolib vs Grammarly

Doctolib (Our mission is to build together the healthcare we all dream of. Learn more about our engineering team on our career page.) and Grammarly (Millions of users rely on Grammarly's AI-powered products to make their messages, documents, and social media posts clear, mistake-free, and impactful.) both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

Grammarly (rank #600) holds a narrow lead over Doctolib (rank #625) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (34 vs 33). The gap of 1 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.

On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Doctolib is slightly ahead of Grammarly. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Doctolib is ahead of Grammarly. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Doctolib is slightly ahead of Grammarly. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Grammarly is clearly ahead of Doctolib. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Grammarly is ahead of Doctolib.

Doctolib carries 776 GitHub stars across 57 public repos, with 9 repositories active in the last 90 days and 5 external contributors on record. Grammarly shows 4,356 stars across 23 public repos, 0 active in the last 90 days and 0 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but Grammarly's footprint is roughly 5.6x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.

Doctolib is the stronger read for anyone weighting education. Grammarly looks better where reach is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.