Our mission is to build together the healthcare we all dream of. Learn more about our engineering team on our career page.
Doctolib vs Gusto
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
Doctolib (Our mission is to build together the healthcare we all dream of. Learn more about our engineering team on our career page.) and Gusto both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
Gusto (rank #338) holds a modest lead over Doctolib (rank #625) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (43 vs 33). The gap of 10 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.
On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Gusto is ahead of Doctolib. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Doctolib is slightly ahead of Gusto. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Gusto is slightly ahead of Doctolib. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Gusto is ahead of Doctolib. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Gusto is ahead of Doctolib.
Doctolib carries 776 GitHub stars across 57 public repos, with 10 repositories active in the last 90 days and 5 external contributors on record. Gusto shows 781 stars across 148 public repos, 20 active in the last 90 days and 6 external contributors.
Doctolib is the stronger read for anyone weighting education. Gusto looks better where momentum is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | Doctolib | Gusto |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #625 | #338 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 33 | 43 |
| Code | 51 | 60 |
| Education | 72 | 66 |
| Community | 28 | 35 |
| Reach | 10 | 19 |
| Momentum | 19 | 33 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 776 | 781 |
| Forks | 81 | 217 |
| Public repos | 57 | 148 |
| Active repos (90d) | 10 | 20 |
| External contributors | 5 | 6 |
| Avg polish | 50 | 53 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 31 | 48 |