Doctolib vs HubSpot

Doctolib (Our mission is to build together the healthcare we all dream of. Learn more about our engineering team on our career page.) and HubSpot both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

HubSpot (rank #93) holds a meaningful lead over Doctolib (rank #625) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (56 vs 33). The gap of 23 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.

On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), HubSpot is slightly ahead of Doctolib. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Doctolib is ahead of HubSpot. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), HubSpot is slightly ahead of Doctolib. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), HubSpot is clearly ahead of Doctolib. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), HubSpot is clearly ahead of Doctolib.

Doctolib carries 776 GitHub stars across 57 public repos, with 10 repositories active in the last 90 days and 5 external contributors on record. HubSpot shows 53,481 stars across 381 public repos, 35 active in the last 90 days and 4 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but HubSpot's footprint is roughly 68.9x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.

Doctolib is the stronger read for anyone weighting education. HubSpot looks better where reach is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.