Our mission is to build together the healthcare we all dream of. Learn more about our engineering team on our career page.
Doctolib vs Humaans
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
Doctolib (Our mission is to build together the healthcare we all dream of. Learn more about our engineering team on our career page.) and Humaans (A better workplace starts here) both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
Doctolib (rank #625) holds a narrow lead over Humaans (rank #696) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (33 vs 31). The gap of 2 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.
On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Doctolib is slightly ahead of Humaans. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Doctolib is slightly ahead of Humaans. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Doctolib is ahead of Humaans. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Doctolib is ahead of Humaans.
Doctolib carries 776 GitHub stars across 57 public repos, with 9 repositories active in the last 90 days and 5 external contributors on record. Humaans shows 461 stars across 9 public repos, 3 active in the last 90 days and 1 external contributors.
Doctolib is the stronger read for anyone weighting community. Humaans makes more sense for teams already using its adjacent tools. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | Doctolib | Humaans |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #625 | #696 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 33 | 31 |
| Code | 51 | 50 |
| Education | 72 | 71 |
| Community | 28 | 15 |
| Reach | 10 | 0 |
| Momentum | 18 | 18 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 776 | 461 |
| Forks | 81 | 18 |
| Public repos | 57 | 9 |
| Active repos (90d) | 9 | 3 |
| External contributors | 5 | 1 |
| Avg polish | 50 | 41 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 31 | 43 |