Doctolib vs draw.io

Doctolib (Our mission is to build together the healthcare we all dream of. Learn more about our engineering team on our career page.) and draw.io (draw.io specialises in browser-based diagramming components and applications.) both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

draw.io (rank #338) holds a modest lead over Doctolib (rank #625) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (43 vs 33). The gap of 10 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.

On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Doctolib is ahead of draw.io. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Doctolib is slightly ahead of draw.io. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), draw.io is clearly ahead of Doctolib. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), draw.io is clearly ahead of Doctolib. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), draw.io is ahead of Doctolib.

Doctolib carries 776 GitHub stars across 57 public repos, with 10 repositories active in the last 90 days and 5 external contributors on record. draw.io shows 86,983 stars across 32 public repos, 12 active in the last 90 days and 13 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but draw.io's footprint is roughly 112.1x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.

Doctolib is the stronger read for anyone weighting code quality. draw.io looks better where reach is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.