Doctolib vs Klarna

Doctolib (Our mission is to build together the healthcare we all dream of. Learn more about our engineering team on our career page.) and Klarna both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

Klarna (rank #257) holds a modest lead over Doctolib (rank #625) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (47 vs 33). The gap of 14 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.

On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Klarna is slightly ahead of Doctolib. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Klarna is slightly ahead of Doctolib. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Klarna is slightly ahead of Doctolib. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Klarna is clearly ahead of Doctolib. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Doctolib is slightly ahead of Klarna.

Doctolib carries 776 GitHub stars across 57 public repos, with 10 repositories active in the last 90 days and 5 external contributors on record. Klarna shows 2,965 stars across 139 public repos, 8 active in the last 90 days and 2 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but Klarna's footprint is roughly 3.8x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.

Doctolib is the stronger read for anyone weighting momentum. Klarna looks better where reach is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.