Our mission is to build together the healthcare we all dream of. Learn more about our engineering team on our career page.
Doctolib vs MailerSend
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
Doctolib (Our mission is to build together the healthcare we all dream of. Learn more about our engineering team on our career page.) and MailerSend (Email service that delivers) both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
MailerSend (rank #401) holds a narrow lead over Doctolib (rank #625) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (41 vs 33). The gap of 8 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.
On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Doctolib is slightly ahead of MailerSend. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), MailerSend is ahead of Doctolib. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), MailerSend is slightly ahead of Doctolib. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), MailerSend is ahead of Doctolib. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), MailerSend is slightly ahead of Doctolib.
Doctolib carries 776 GitHub stars across 57 public repos, with 10 repositories active in the last 90 days and 5 external contributors on record. MailerSend shows 499 stars across 22 public repos, 12 active in the last 90 days and 7 external contributors.
Doctolib is the stronger read for anyone weighting code quality. MailerSend looks better where reach is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | Doctolib | MailerSend |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #625 | #401 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 33 | 41 |
| Code | 51 | 50 |
| Education | 72 | 82 |
| Community | 28 | 30 |
| Reach | 10 | 24 |
| Momentum | 19 | 27 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 776 | 499 |
| Forks | 81 | 141 |
| Public repos | 57 | 22 |
| Active repos (90d) | 10 | 12 |
| External contributors | 5 | 7 |
| Avg polish | 50 | 50 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 31 | 37 |