Doctolib vs Matomo Analytics

Doctolib (Our mission is to build together the healthcare we all dream of. Learn more about our engineering team on our career page.) and Matomo Analytics (Matomo is hiring 🚀 Matomo.org/jobs MISSION: « To create, as a community, the leading open analytics platform that gives every user full control of their data ») both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

Matomo Analytics (rank #338) holds a modest lead over Doctolib (rank #625) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (43 vs 33). The gap of 10 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.

On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Matomo Analytics is slightly ahead of Doctolib. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Doctolib is slightly ahead of Matomo Analytics. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Matomo Analytics is clearly ahead of Doctolib. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Matomo Analytics is ahead of Doctolib. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Matomo Analytics is clearly ahead of Doctolib.

Doctolib carries 776 GitHub stars across 57 public repos, with 10 repositories active in the last 90 days and 5 external contributors on record. Matomo Analytics shows 30,600 stars across 90 public repos, 46 active in the last 90 days and 34 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but Matomo Analytics's footprint is roughly 39.4x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.

Doctolib is the stronger read for anyone weighting education. Matomo Analytics looks better where momentum is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.