Doctolib vs Miro

Doctolib (Our mission is to build together the healthcare we all dream of. Learn more about our engineering team on our career page.) and Miro (Visual workspace for innovation) both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

Miro (rank #485) holds a narrow lead over Doctolib (rank #625) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (38 vs 33). The gap of 5 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.

On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Miro is slightly ahead of Doctolib. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Miro is ahead of Doctolib. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Miro is slightly ahead of Doctolib. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Doctolib is ahead of Miro. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Doctolib is ahead of Miro.

Doctolib carries 776 GitHub stars across 57 public repos, with 10 repositories active in the last 90 days and 5 external contributors on record. Miro shows 843 stars across 45 public repos, 4 active in the last 90 days and 6 external contributors.

Doctolib is the stronger read for anyone weighting momentum. Miro looks better where education is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.