Our mission is to build together the healthcare we all dream of. Learn more about our engineering team on our career page.
Doctolib vs Patreon
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
Doctolib (Our mission is to build together the healthcare we all dream of. Learn more about our engineering team on our career page.) and Patreon both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
Patreon (rank #536) holds a narrow lead over Doctolib (rank #625) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (36 vs 33). The gap of 3 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.
On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Patreon is slightly ahead of Doctolib. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Doctolib is ahead of Patreon. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Doctolib is slightly ahead of Patreon. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Patreon is clearly ahead of Doctolib. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Doctolib is ahead of Patreon.
Doctolib carries 776 GitHub stars across 57 public repos, with 10 repositories active in the last 90 days and 5 external contributors on record. Patreon shows 846 stars across 62 public repos, 0 active in the last 90 days and 2 external contributors.
Doctolib is the stronger read for anyone weighting momentum. Patreon looks better where reach is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | Doctolib | Patreon |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #625 | #536 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 33 | 36 |
| Code | 51 | 52 |
| Education | 72 | 63 |
| Community | 28 | 26 |
| Reach | 10 | 61 |
| Momentum | 19 | 0 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 776 | 846 |
| Forks | 81 | 220 |
| Public repos | 57 | 62 |
| Active repos (90d) | 10 | 0 |
| External contributors | 5 | 2 |
| Avg polish | 50 | 53 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 31 | 37 |