Doctolib vs Pirsch Analytics

Doctolib (Our mission is to build together the healthcare we all dream of. Learn more about our engineering team on our career page.) and Pirsch Analytics (Pirsch is a simple, privacy-friendly, open-source alternative to Google Analytics - lightweight, cookie-free and easily integrated into any website. By @emvi.) both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

Doctolib and Pirsch Analytics sit at essentially the same overall ecosystem score (33), which is unusual and worth reading through the pillars below.

On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Doctolib is slightly ahead of Pirsch Analytics. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Doctolib is slightly ahead of Pirsch Analytics. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Pirsch Analytics is slightly ahead of Doctolib. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Pirsch Analytics is ahead of Doctolib. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Doctolib is slightly ahead of Pirsch Analytics.

Doctolib carries 776 GitHub stars across 57 public repos, with 9 repositories active in the last 90 days and 5 external contributors on record. Pirsch Analytics shows 1,203 stars across 24 public repos, 5 active in the last 90 days and 1 external contributors.

Doctolib is the stronger read for anyone weighting momentum. Pirsch Analytics looks better where reach is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.