Our mission is to build together the healthcare we all dream of. Learn more about our engineering team on our career page.
Doctolib vs Qonto
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
Doctolib (Our mission is to build together the healthcare we all dream of. Learn more about our engineering team on our career page.) and Qonto both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
Qonto (rank #338) holds a modest lead over Doctolib (rank #625) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (43 vs 33). The gap of 10 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.
On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Qonto is slightly ahead of Doctolib. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Qonto is slightly ahead of Doctolib. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Doctolib is slightly ahead of Qonto. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Qonto is ahead of Doctolib. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Qonto is slightly ahead of Doctolib.
Doctolib carries 776 GitHub stars across 57 public repos, with 10 repositories active in the last 90 days and 5 external contributors on record. Qonto shows 501 stars across 75 public repos, 11 active in the last 90 days and 5 external contributors.
Doctolib is the stronger read for anyone weighting community. Qonto looks better where reach is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | Doctolib | Qonto |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #625 | #338 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 33 | 43 |
| Code | 51 | 57 |
| Education | 72 | 75 |
| Community | 28 | 25 |
| Reach | 10 | 24 |
| Momentum | 19 | 21 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 776 | 501 |
| Forks | 81 | 158 |
| Public repos | 57 | 75 |
| Active repos (90d) | 10 | 11 |
| External contributors | 5 | 5 |
| Avg polish | 50 | 62 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 31 | 36 |