Doctolib vs Skyscanner

Doctolib (Our mission is to build together the healthcare we all dream of. Learn more about our engineering team on our career page.) and Skyscanner both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

Skyscanner (rank #209) holds a modest lead over Doctolib (rank #625) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (49 vs 33). The gap of 16 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.

On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Skyscanner is ahead of Doctolib. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Skyscanner is ahead of Doctolib. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Skyscanner is clearly ahead of Doctolib. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Skyscanner is clearly ahead of Doctolib.

Doctolib carries 776 GitHub stars across 57 public repos, with 10 repositories active in the last 90 days and 5 external contributors on record. Skyscanner shows 8,167 stars across 86 public repos, 18 active in the last 90 days and 39 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but Skyscanner's footprint is roughly 10.5x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.

Doctolib is worth a look for teams already invested in its stack. Skyscanner looks better where reach is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.