Our mission is to build together the healthcare we all dream of. Learn more about our engineering team on our career page.
Doctolib vs Sprout Social
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
Doctolib (Our mission is to build together the healthcare we all dream of. Learn more about our engineering team on our career page.) and Sprout Social both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
Sprout Social (rank #401) holds a narrow lead over Doctolib (rank #625) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (41 vs 33). The gap of 8 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.
On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Doctolib is slightly ahead of Sprout Social. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Doctolib is ahead of Sprout Social. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Doctolib is ahead of Sprout Social. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Sprout Social is clearly ahead of Doctolib. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Sprout Social is clearly ahead of Doctolib.
Doctolib carries 776 GitHub stars across 57 public repos, with 10 repositories active in the last 90 days and 5 external contributors on record. Sprout Social shows 313 stars across 68 public repos, 4 active in the last 90 days and 3 external contributors.
Doctolib is the stronger read for anyone weighting education. Sprout Social looks better where momentum is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | Doctolib | Sprout Social |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #625 | #401 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 33 | 41 |
| Code | 51 | 48 |
| Education | 72 | 52 |
| Community | 28 | 17 |
| Reach | 10 | 41 |
| Momentum | 19 | 60 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 776 | 313 |
| Forks | 81 | 122 |
| Public repos | 57 | 68 |
| Active repos (90d) | 10 | 4 |
| External contributors | 5 | 3 |
| Avg polish | 50 | 47 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 31 | 30 |