Doctolib vs Starling Bank

Doctolib (Our mission is to build together the healthcare we all dream of. Learn more about our engineering team on our career page.) and Starling Bank both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

Doctolib and Starling Bank sit at essentially the same overall ecosystem score (33), which is unusual and worth reading through the pillars below.

On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Doctolib is slightly ahead of Starling Bank. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Doctolib is ahead of Starling Bank. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Doctolib is ahead of Starling Bank. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Starling Bank is clearly ahead of Doctolib. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Starling Bank is clearly ahead of Doctolib.

Doctolib carries 776 GitHub stars across 57 public repos, with 9 repositories active in the last 90 days and 5 external contributors on record. Starling Bank shows 195 stars across 3 public repos, 3 active in the last 90 days and 0 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but Doctolib's footprint is roughly 4.0x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.

Doctolib is the stronger read for anyone weighting community. Starling Bank looks better where reach is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.