Doctolib vs UserTesting

Doctolib (Our mission is to build together the healthcare we all dream of. Learn more about our engineering team on our career page.) and UserTesting (Real. Human. Insight.) both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

Doctolib (rank #625) holds a narrow lead over UserTesting (rank #696) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (33 vs 31). The gap of 2 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.

On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Doctolib is ahead of UserTesting. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Doctolib is ahead of UserTesting. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Doctolib is ahead of UserTesting. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), UserTesting is clearly ahead of Doctolib. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Doctolib is ahead of UserTesting.

Doctolib carries 776 GitHub stars across 57 public repos, with 9 repositories active in the last 90 days and 5 external contributors on record. UserTesting shows 15 stars across 119 public repos, 0 active in the last 90 days and 0 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but Doctolib's footprint is roughly 51.7x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.

Doctolib is the stronger read for anyone weighting momentum. UserTesting looks better where reach is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.