Doctolib vs Zammad

Doctolib (Our mission is to build together the healthcare we all dream of. Learn more about our engineering team on our career page.) and Zammad both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

Zammad (rank #152) holds a modest lead over Doctolib (rank #625) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (52 vs 33). The gap of 19 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.

On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Zammad is ahead of Doctolib. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Doctolib is slightly ahead of Zammad. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Zammad is clearly ahead of Doctolib. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Doctolib is ahead of Zammad. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Zammad is ahead of Doctolib.

Doctolib carries 776 GitHub stars across 57 public repos, with 10 repositories active in the last 90 days and 5 external contributors on record. Zammad shows 6,394 stars across 11 public repos, 9 active in the last 90 days and 27 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but Zammad's footprint is roughly 8.2x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.

Doctolib is the stronger read for anyone weighting reach. Zammad looks better where community is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.