Doctolib vs Zulip

Doctolib (Our mission is to build together the healthcare we all dream of. Learn more about our engineering team on our career page.) and Zulip (Organized team chat) both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

Zulip (rank #536) holds a narrow lead over Doctolib (rank #625) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (36 vs 33). The gap of 3 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.

On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Zulip is ahead of Doctolib. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Doctolib is clearly ahead of Zulip. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Zulip is ahead of Doctolib. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Zulip is ahead of Doctolib. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Zulip is ahead of Doctolib.

Doctolib carries 776 GitHub stars across 57 public repos, with 10 repositories active in the last 90 days and 5 external contributors on record. Zulip shows 32,299 stars across 67 public repos, 9 active in the last 90 days and 76 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but Zulip's footprint is roughly 41.6x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.

Doctolib is the stronger read for anyone weighting education. Zulip looks better where community is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.