Empowering people with simple yet powerful tools ✨
Doist vs Formbricks
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
Doist (Empowering people with simple yet powerful tools ✨) and Formbricks (Open Source Qualtrics Alternative) both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
Doist (rank #122) holds a narrow lead over Formbricks (rank #237) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (54 vs 48). The gap of 6 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.
On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Doist is slightly ahead of Formbricks. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Doist is ahead of Formbricks. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Formbricks is ahead of Doist. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Doist is slightly ahead of Formbricks. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Doist is clearly ahead of Formbricks.
Doist carries 5,576 GitHub stars across 170 public repos, with 45 repositories active in the last 90 days and 21 external contributors on record. Formbricks shows 12,675 stars across 18 public repos, 9 active in the last 90 days and 6 external contributors.
Doist is the stronger read for anyone weighting momentum. Formbricks looks better where community is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | Doist | Formbricks |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #122 | #237 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 54 | 48 |
| Code | 59 | 53 |
| Education | 85 | 67 |
| Community | 36 | 47 |
| Reach | 40 | 36 |
| Momentum | 46 | 24 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 5,576 | 12,675 |
| Forks | 563 | 2,459 |
| Public repos | 170 | 18 |
| Active repos (90d) | 45 | 9 |
| External contributors | 21 | 6 |
| Avg polish | 58 | 57 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 47 | 37 |