Developer ecosystem comparison
vs

Doist vs Healthchecks

Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.

Doist (Empowering people with simple yet powerful tools ✨) and Healthchecks (Open-source cron job and background task monitoring) both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

Doist (rank #122) holds a modest lead over Healthchecks (rank #455) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (54 vs 39). The gap of 15 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.

On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Doist is ahead of Healthchecks. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Doist is ahead of Healthchecks. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Healthchecks is slightly ahead of Doist. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Doist is ahead of Healthchecks. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Doist is ahead of Healthchecks.

Doist carries 5,576 GitHub stars across 170 public repos, with 45 repositories active in the last 90 days and 21 external contributors on record. Healthchecks shows 10,273 stars across 3 public repos, 1 active in the last 90 days and 1 external contributors.

Doist is the stronger read for anyone weighting code quality. Healthchecks looks better where community is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.

Side-by-side metrics

MetricDoistHealthchecks
Ranking
Overall rank#122#455
Pillars
Overall5439
Code5948
Education8575
Community3641
Reach4030
Momentum4636
Builder experience00
Signals
Stars5,57610,273
Forks5631,041
Public repos1703
Active repos (90d)451
External contributors211
Avg polish5857
Avg AI-readiness4728

Fork ecosystems

Loading fork ecosystem…
Loading fork ecosystem…
View Doist developer profileView Healthchecks developer profile