Empowering people with simple yet powerful tools ✨
Doist vs Instructure, Inc.
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
Doist (Empowering people with simple yet powerful tools ✨) and Instructure, Inc. both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
Doist (rank #122) holds a modest lead over Instructure, Inc. (rank #317) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (54 vs 44). The gap of 10 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.
On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Doist is slightly ahead of Instructure, Inc.. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Doist is clearly ahead of Instructure, Inc.. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Instructure, Inc. is ahead of Doist. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Doist is ahead of Instructure, Inc.. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Doist is slightly ahead of Instructure, Inc..
Doist carries 5,576 GitHub stars across 170 public repos, with 45 repositories active in the last 90 days and 21 external contributors on record. Instructure, Inc. shows 10,186 stars across 212 public repos, 37 active in the last 90 days and 29 external contributors.
Doist is the stronger read for anyone weighting education. Instructure, Inc. looks better where community is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | Doist | Instructure, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #122 | #317 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 54 | 44 |
| Code | 59 | 56 |
| Education | 85 | 50 |
| Community | 36 | 45 |
| Reach | 40 | 24 |
| Momentum | 46 | 43 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 5,576 | 10,186 |
| Forks | 563 | 4,189 |
| Public repos | 170 | 212 |
| Active repos (90d) | 45 | 37 |
| External contributors | 21 | 29 |
| Avg polish | 58 | 50 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 47 | 41 |