Empowering people with simple yet powerful tools ✨
Doist vs InVision
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
Doist (Empowering people with simple yet powerful tools ✨) and InVision both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
Doist (rank #122) holds a modest lead over InVision (rank #430) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (54 vs 40). The gap of 14 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.
On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Doist is ahead of InVision. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Doist is slightly ahead of InVision. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Doist is clearly ahead of InVision. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Doist is clearly ahead of InVision.
Doist carries 5,576 GitHub stars across 170 public repos, with 45 repositories active in the last 90 days and 21 external contributors on record. InVision shows 1,303 stars across 114 public repos, 0 active in the last 90 days and 0 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but Doist's footprint is roughly 4.3x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.
Doist is the stronger read for anyone weighting momentum. InVision makes more sense for teams already using its adjacent tools. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | Doist | InVision |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #122 | #430 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 54 | 40 |
| Code | 59 | 46 |
| Education | 85 | 80 |
| Community | 36 | 14 |
| Reach | 40 | 40 |
| Momentum | 46 | 0 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 5,576 | 1,303 |
| Forks | 563 | 193 |
| Public repos | 170 | 114 |
| Active repos (90d) | 45 | 0 |
| External contributors | 21 | 0 |
| Avg polish | 58 | 52 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 47 | 34 |