Empowering people with simple yet powerful tools ✨
Doist vs Jamf
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
Doist (Empowering people with simple yet powerful tools ✨) and Jamf both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
Doist (rank #122) holds a modest lead over Jamf (rank #430) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (54 vs 40). The gap of 14 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.
On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Doist is clearly ahead of Jamf. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Doist is ahead of Jamf. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Jamf is slightly ahead of Doist. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Jamf is slightly ahead of Doist. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Jamf is ahead of Doist.
Doist carries 5,576 GitHub stars across 170 public repos, with 45 repositories active in the last 90 days and 21 external contributors on record. Jamf shows 7,946 stars across 114 public repos, 20 active in the last 90 days and 5 external contributors.
Doist is the stronger read for anyone weighting code quality. Jamf looks better where momentum is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | Doist | Jamf |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #122 | #430 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 54 | 40 |
| Code | 59 | 33 |
| Education | 85 | 68 |
| Community | 36 | 41 |
| Reach | 40 | 44 |
| Momentum | 46 | 61 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 5,576 | 7,946 |
| Forks | 563 | 1,547 |
| Public repos | 170 | 114 |
| Active repos (90d) | 45 | 20 |
| External contributors | 21 | 5 |
| Avg polish | 58 | 45 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 47 | 21 |