Empowering people with simple yet powerful tools ✨
Doist vs Kandji
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
Doist (Empowering people with simple yet powerful tools ✨) and Kandji both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
Doist (rank #122) holds a meaningful lead over Kandji (rank #728) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (54 vs 30). The gap of 24 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.
On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Doist is ahead of Kandji. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Doist is clearly ahead of Kandji. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Doist is ahead of Kandji. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Doist is ahead of Kandji. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Kandji is slightly ahead of Doist.
Doist carries 5,576 GitHub stars across 170 public repos, with 45 repositories active in the last 90 days and 21 external contributors on record. Kandji shows 387 stars across 7 public repos, 6 active in the last 90 days and 3 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but Doist's footprint is roughly 14.4x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.
Doist is the stronger read for anyone weighting education. Kandji looks better where momentum is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | Doist | Kandji |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #122 | #728 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 54 | 30 |
| Code | 59 | 44 |
| Education | 85 | 44 |
| Community | 36 | 26 |
| Reach | 40 | 30 |
| Momentum | 46 | 48 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 5,576 | 387 |
| Forks | 563 | 56 |
| Public repos | 170 | 7 |
| Active repos (90d) | 45 | 6 |
| External contributors | 21 | 3 |
| Avg polish | 58 | 46 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 47 | 29 |