Empowering people with simple yet powerful tools ✨
Doist vs LogRocket
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
Doist (Empowering people with simple yet powerful tools ✨) and LogRocket (Record and replay user sessions to fix bugs faster.) both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
Doist (rank #122) holds a modest lead over LogRocket (rank #372) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (54 vs 42). The gap of 12 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.
On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Doist is ahead of LogRocket. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Doist is clearly ahead of LogRocket. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Doist is ahead of LogRocket. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Doist is ahead of LogRocket. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Doist is slightly ahead of LogRocket.
Doist carries 5,576 GitHub stars across 170 public repos, with 45 repositories active in the last 90 days and 21 external contributors on record. LogRocket shows 6,668 stars across 16 public repos, 5 active in the last 90 days and 2 external contributors.
Doist is the stronger read for anyone weighting education. LogRocket makes more sense for teams already using its adjacent tools. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | Doist | LogRocket |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #122 | #372 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 54 | 42 |
| Code | 59 | 46 |
| Education | 85 | 62 |
| Community | 36 | 23 |
| Reach | 40 | 22 |
| Momentum | 46 | 43 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 5,576 | 6,668 |
| Forks | 563 | 379 |
| Public repos | 170 | 16 |
| Active repos (90d) | 45 | 5 |
| External contributors | 21 | 2 |
| Avg polish | 58 | 42 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 47 | 20 |