Empowering people with simple yet powerful tools ✨
Doist vs Moodle Development
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
Doist (Empowering people with simple yet powerful tools ✨) and Moodle Development both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
Doist (rank #122) holds a modest lead over Moodle Development (rank #602) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (54 vs 34). The gap of 20 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.
On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Doist is ahead of Moodle Development. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Doist is clearly ahead of Moodle Development. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Moodle Development is slightly ahead of Doist. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Doist is ahead of Moodle Development. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Doist is clearly ahead of Moodle Development.
Doist carries 5,576 GitHub stars across 170 public repos, with 45 repositories active in the last 90 days and 21 external contributors on record. Moodle Development shows 7,353 stars across 15 public repos, 4 active in the last 90 days and 25 external contributors.
Doist is the stronger read for anyone weighting education. Moodle Development looks better where community is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | Doist | Moodle Development |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #122 | #602 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 54 | 34 |
| Code | 59 | 43 |
| Education | 85 | 45 |
| Community | 36 | 39 |
| Reach | 40 | 26 |
| Momentum | 46 | 13 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 5,576 | 7,353 |
| Forks | 563 | 8,234 |
| Public repos | 170 | 15 |
| Active repos (90d) | 45 | 4 |
| External contributors | 21 | 25 |
| Avg polish | 58 | 42 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 47 | 25 |