Empowering people with simple yet powerful tools ✨
Doist vs mParticle by Rokt
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
Doist (Empowering people with simple yet powerful tools ✨) and mParticle by Rokt both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
Doist (rank #122) holds a modest lead over mParticle by Rokt (rank #338) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (54 vs 43). The gap of 11 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.
On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Doist is clearly ahead of mParticle by Rokt. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), mParticle by Rokt is slightly ahead of Doist. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Doist is ahead of mParticle by Rokt. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Doist is ahead of mParticle by Rokt.
Doist carries 5,576 GitHub stars across 170 public repos, with 45 repositories active in the last 90 days and 21 external contributors on record. mParticle by Rokt shows 317 stars across 85 public repos, 14 active in the last 90 days and 21 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but Doist's footprint is roughly 17.6x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.
Doist is the stronger read for anyone weighting education. mParticle by Rokt looks better where community is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | Doist | mParticle by Rokt |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #122 | #338 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 54 | 43 |
| Code | 59 | 59 |
| Education | 85 | 63 |
| Community | 36 | 38 |
| Reach | 40 | 28 |
| Momentum | 46 | 27 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 5,576 | 317 |
| Forks | 563 | 521 |
| Public repos | 170 | 85 |
| Active repos (90d) | 45 | 14 |
| External contributors | 21 | 21 |
| Avg polish | 58 | 62 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 47 | 50 |