Empowering people with simple yet powerful tools ✨
Doist vs Podium
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
Doist (Empowering people with simple yet powerful tools ✨) and Podium both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
Doist (rank #122) holds a modest lead over Podium (rank #372) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (54 vs 42). The gap of 12 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.
On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Podium is slightly ahead of Doist. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Doist is ahead of Podium. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Doist is ahead of Podium. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Podium is ahead of Doist. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Doist is clearly ahead of Podium.
Doist carries 5,576 GitHub stars across 170 public repos, with 45 repositories active in the last 90 days and 21 external contributors on record. Podium shows 86 stars across 25 public repos, 7 active in the last 90 days and 3 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but Doist's footprint is roughly 64.8x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.
Doist is the stronger read for anyone weighting momentum. Podium looks better where reach is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | Doist | Podium |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #122 | #372 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 54 | 42 |
| Code | 59 | 63 |
| Education | 85 | 72 |
| Community | 36 | 16 |
| Reach | 40 | 59 |
| Momentum | 46 | 15 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 5,576 | 86 |
| Forks | 563 | 75 |
| Public repos | 170 | 25 |
| Active repos (90d) | 45 | 7 |
| External contributors | 21 | 3 |
| Avg polish | 58 | 61 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 47 | 37 |