Doist vs Softr

Doist (Empowering people with simple yet powerful tools ✨) and Softr (Softr Platforms GmbH) both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

Doist (rank #122) holds a modest lead over Softr (rank #455) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (54 vs 39). The gap of 15 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.

On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Doist is clearly ahead of Softr. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Doist is ahead of Softr. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Doist is slightly ahead of Softr. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Doist is clearly ahead of Softr.

Doist carries 5,576 GitHub stars across 170 public repos, with 45 repositories active in the last 90 days and 21 external contributors on record. Softr shows 1 stars across 2 public repos, 1 active in the last 90 days and 12 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but Doist's footprint is roughly 5576.0x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.

Doist is the stronger read for anyone weighting code quality. Softr makes more sense for teams already using its adjacent tools. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.