Empowering people with simple yet powerful tools ✨
Swimlane is a Security Automation and Orchestration platform
Doist vs Swimlane
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
Doist (Empowering people with simple yet powerful tools ✨) and Swimlane (Swimlane is a Security Automation and Orchestration platform) both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
Doist (rank #122) holds a narrow lead over Swimlane (rank #141) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (54 vs 53). The gap of 1 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.
On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Swimlane is slightly ahead of Doist. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Doist is clearly ahead of Swimlane. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Swimlane is slightly ahead of Doist. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Doist is ahead of Swimlane. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Doist is ahead of Swimlane.
Doist carries 5,576 GitHub stars across 170 public repos, with 45 repositories active in the last 90 days and 21 external contributors on record. Swimlane shows 14,614 stars across 128 public repos, 10 active in the last 90 days and 11 external contributors.
Doist is the stronger read for anyone weighting education. Swimlane looks better where code quality is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | Doist | Swimlane |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #122 | #141 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 54 | 53 |
| Code | 59 | 66 |
| Education | 85 | 62 |
| Community | 36 | 40 |
| Reach | 40 | 25 |
| Momentum | 46 | 31 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 5,576 | 14,614 |
| Forks | 563 | 4,219 |
| Public repos | 170 | 128 |
| Active repos (90d) | 45 | 10 |
| External contributors | 21 | 11 |
| Avg polish | 58 | 65 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 47 | 44 |