Empowering people with simple yet powerful tools ✨
Doist vs The Washington Post
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
Doist (Empowering people with simple yet powerful tools ✨) and The Washington Post both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
Doist (rank #122) holds a modest lead over The Washington Post (rank #510) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (54 vs 37). The gap of 17 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.
On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Doist is ahead of The Washington Post. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Doist is clearly ahead of The Washington Post. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Doist is ahead of The Washington Post. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), The Washington Post is ahead of Doist. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Doist is clearly ahead of The Washington Post.
Doist carries 5,576 GitHub stars across 170 public repos, with 45 repositories active in the last 90 days and 21 external contributors on record. The Washington Post shows 2,751 stars across 91 public repos, 3 active in the last 90 days and 0 external contributors.
Doist is the stronger read for anyone weighting education. The Washington Post looks better where reach is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | Doist | The Washington Post |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #122 | #510 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 54 | 37 |
| Code | 59 | 50 |
| Education | 85 | 49 |
| Community | 36 | 18 |
| Reach | 40 | 50 |
| Momentum | 46 | 18 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 5,576 | 2,751 |
| Forks | 563 | 1,061 |
| Public repos | 170 | 91 |
| Active repos (90d) | 45 | 3 |
| External contributors | 21 | 0 |
| Avg polish | 58 | 55 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 47 | 30 |