Doist vs Wrike

Doist (Empowering people with simple yet powerful tools ✨) and Wrike (Welcome to the Wrike TechClub open source community. Let's make tech world better together! NB: members must have two-factor auth.) both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

Doist (rank #122) holds a modest lead over Wrike (rank #602) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (54 vs 34). The gap of 20 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.

On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Doist is ahead of Wrike. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Doist is slightly ahead of Wrike. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Doist is clearly ahead of Wrike. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Doist is clearly ahead of Wrike. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Doist is ahead of Wrike.

Doist carries 5,576 GitHub stars across 170 public repos, with 45 repositories active in the last 90 days and 21 external contributors on record. Wrike shows 276 stars across 33 public repos, 1 active in the last 90 days and 0 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but Doist's footprint is roughly 20.2x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.

Doist is the stronger read for anyone weighting community. Wrike makes more sense for teams already using its adjacent tools. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.